Morphological characteristics of adolescent elite female handball and volleyball players

Authors

  • Noutsos S. Konstantinos Sector of Sports Games, School of Physical Education & Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Ethnikis Antistasis 41, Daphne, 17237,GREECE Author
  • Meletakos G. Panagiotis Sector of Sports Games, School of Physical Education & Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Ethnikis Antistasis 41, Daphne, 17237,GREECE Author
  • Bayios A. Ioannis Sector of Sports Games, School of Physical Education & Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Ethnikis Antistasis 41, Daphne, 17237,GREECE Additional information <footer Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s4217

Keywords:

Handball, Volleyball, Anthropometry, Body composition, Somatotype

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to compare morphological characteristics of adolescent elite female handball and volleyball players and to investigate probable differences between them. The sample of the current study consists of athletes from women’s national handball teams (n=32, age=17.8±1.1 years, body height 166.6±4.5 cm, body mass 65.0±5.4 kg) and volleyball (n=16, age=18.0±1.4 years, body height 176.5±5.7 cm, body mass 68.1±7.4 kg). The measurements included five skin folds thicknesses (biceps, triceps, subscapular, suprailiac and calf), three circumferences [calf and biceps girth (relaxed and tensed)] end two widths (femur, humerus). In the initial somatometric parameters, the athletes exhibit higher performance triceps (p<0.001), subscapular (p<0.001) skinfold (mm) and biceps girth (relaxed) (cm) while volleyball players exhibit body height (cm) (p<0.05) and humeral diameter (cm) (p<0.05). In the secondary parameters, handball players express statistically significant body mass indices (kg/m²) (p<0.05), body fat (%) (p<0.002), sum of 5 skinfold (mm) (p<0.001), while volleyball players express fat free mass (kg) (p<0.001). The handball players’ somatotype is taken to be a mesomorph-endomorph (3.9–3.8–1.7) with a much greater component in endomorphy (p<0.001), mesomorphy (p<0.001), and SDM (p<0.001), while volleyball players were taken as balanced endomorph (3.3– 2.6–3.1) with a much greater component of ectomorphy (p<0.001), και SAM (p<0.006). In conclusion, the differences may probably be due to the specific training of the female athletes.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-31

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Morphological characteristics of adolescent elite female handball and volleyball players. (2019). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(S4), 1502-1507. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s4217