Instructional strategies to enhance motor performance in female youth athletes

Authors

  • Fogliata Arianna Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, ITALY. Author
  • Mazzella Mariapia Department of Human, Social, and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Frosinone, ITALY. Author
  • Gravino Gianluca Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, ITALY. Author
  • Ambretti Antinea Department of Human Sciences, Education, and Sport, Telematic Pegaso University, Naples, ITALY. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2025.03059

Abstract

Problem Statement: During pre-adolescence and adolescence, motor development is influenced by maturation processes that impact coordination and strength abilities. Using simple, well-practiced tasks with competitive young female athletes presents an opportunity to isolate the effects of various instructional approaches (Causebased, Effect-based, and Technical) during these critical developmental stages. This enables an exploration of how and whether these strategies can enhance motor learning. Approach: Ninety-six athletes were selected based on their competitive experience, training frequency, and medical-postural evaluations. After a one-week familiarization period, participants completed two experimental sessions, each separated by 72 h. Vertical jump performance [Squat Jump (SJ), Countermovement Jump (CMJ), and Drop Jump (DJ)] was evaluated using the BoscoSystem platform, while isometric strength was assessed with dynamometers. Each evaluation incorporated the three instructional explanation approaches. Purpose: This study explored the effects of three instructional explanation approaches (Cause-based, Effect-based, and Technical) on the motor performance of pre-adolescent (mean age = 13.5 years) and adolescent (mean age = 15.1 years) female volleyball players. Results: The Causebased approach led to significant enhancements in jump height (p < 0.0001) and power (p < 0.0001), with more pronounced effects noted in the SJ and CMJ. These improvements were particularly evident in pre-adolescents, while the effects were less pronounced in older adolescents. No significant differences were observed in isometric strength (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Cause-based explanations are especially effective for individuals with lower relative motor maturation. This suggests that instructional strategies should be customized not only based on age but also considering competitive experience and readiness for motor learning. Key words Didactics, strength evaluation, adolescent development, explanation, physical education

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Instructional strategies to enhance motor performance in female youth athletes. (2025). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 25(3), 539-547. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2025.03059