Examining strength, muscular power, and maximal performance in the power clean among CrossFit® practitioners

Authors

  • Matheus Linhares Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Caian Façanha Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy and Functionality/Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Ceará; Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Mateus Teixeira Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Kailane Santos Alves Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Thiago Pires Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Victor Coswig Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Christian Cabido Postgraduate Program in Physical Education/Department of Physical Education - UFMA; São Luís, MA, BR Author
  • Rogério César Fermino Federal Technological University of Paraná, Physical Education Graduate Program. Research Group in Environment, Physical Activity, and Health. Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL; Federal University of Paraná, Physical Education Graduate Program. Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL Author
  • Saulo Oliveira Physical Education Graduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antâo, PE, BR Author
  • Thiago Mattos Frota de Souza Applied Kinesiology Laboratory–LCA, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas. Campinas, SP Author
  • Felipe J Aidar Federal University of Sergipe, Department of Physical Education, São Cristóvão, SE, BRAZIL Author
  • Tatiana Acioli UNIFBV – Universitary Center, Recife, PE, BRAZIL Author
  • Maria do Socorro Cirilo-Sousa Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, BRAZIL; Department of Physical Education, Regional University of Crato, Crato, CE, BRAZIL Author
  • Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, BR Author
  • Fabiola Bertú Collegiate of Physical Education, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, PE, BRAZIL; Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, PE, BR Author
  • Claudio Oliveira Assumpção Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Sports Sciences, Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNER), Exercise Biology Research Lab (BioEx), Uberaba, MG, BRAZIL. Author
  • Túlio Banja Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL; Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy and Functionality/Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Ceará; Fortaleza, CE, BRAZIL Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.11356

Keywords:

High-Intensity Interval Training, Conditioning, Athletic Performance, Neuromuscular Assessment

Abstract

Background: CrossFit® (CF) a globally embraced fitness program, has gained widespread popularity for its comprehensive approach to improving overall fitness. Central to its methodology is the emphasis on enhancing various physical attributes, including strength and muscular power. The power clean (PC), an integral exercise within CF, serves as an importante tool for assessing the muscular strength profile. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the intricate relationship between muscle strength, power variables, and maximal performance in executing the PC, an Olympic Weightlifting exercise, among CF practitioners. Material and methods: Thirty-five recreationally trained men, with an average age of 31 ± 5.2 years and a body mass of 85.7 ± 13.6 kg, actively participated in the study. The assessment of muscular strength involved key measures such as the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test, countermovement vertical jump (CMJ), and relative 1-RM progressive test specifically tailored for the PC exercise. Results: Our findings found significant correlations between the indices of strength, muscle power and load in PC. The variables exhibiting the highest correlations with 1-RM in the PC were maximal dynamic strength (Fmax (dyn)) (R=0.76), maximal power (Pmax) (R=0.71), and maximal isometric strength (Fmax (iso)) (R=0.51). However, lower limbs power output (LLP) (R=0.42) was very low predictive value and RFD presented trivial and small correlation values without statistical significance. Conclusion: We conclude that Fmax (dyn) and Pmax have a greater capacity to estimate 1-RM in the PC exercise in CF practitioners. Fmax (iso) and LLP had a lower predictive capacity, certainly because they are not evaluated during PC movement. The RFD, despite being important, showed trivial-low predictive capacity, certainly because it was measured during the IMTP test. Further studies with other OW exercises may provide more detailed information about the relationship between strength variables and the execution of these movements.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Examining strength, muscular power, and maximal performance in the power clean among CrossFit® practitioners. (2023). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(11), 3119-3126. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.11356